|
OVERVIEW OF THE
TITANIAN™ ACADEMIC EDUCATION PROGRAM
Introduction
Our current educational system is fraught with many obstacles to the
development of a student’s creativity. Not the least of these is the
long-established custom of motivating students with rewards and
punishments. Students under this system earn rewards and avoid
punishments by achieving high test scores on tests that measure
their ability to regurgitate old information rather than to create
new information. The resulting culture instills
fear
in the students affected: fear of getting the “wrong” answer, fear
of getting low grades, and fear of embarrassment and humiliation.
Such fears inevitably limit or diminish the students’ ability to be
creative, and in many instances destroys this ability utterly.
A Historical Lesson
In 1950 a similar situation plagued the manufacturing industries of
Japan, which were still attempting to recover from World War II. At
that time Japanese industrial creativity was at an all time low, so
the words “made in Japan” were considered worldwide to mean “cheap
shoddy imitation”. Having little to lose, Japanese industrialists
decided to apply the management methodology suggested to them by the
American expert, William Edward Deming. So effective were Deming’s
suggestions, which he unassumingly labeled “Statistical Quality
Control”, that within five years Japanese industry had regained the
respect of industrialists the world over. By 1960 Japanese
industries ranked among the world’s best, and by 1965 they were
outperforming their overseas competitors without exception. Clearly,
this phenomenal success by Japanese industry proves that Dr.
Deming’s suggestions acted as a powerful catalyst of industrial
creativity.
In the years that
followed, Japanese educators attempted to apply Deming’s management
methodology to the field of education. But this worthy experiment
failed to do for Japanese education what the preceding experiment
had done for Japanese industry. We know now how it failed and how to
correct the errors made in the attempt.
The Podolsky-Sulliger Contribution
In 1991 two mental health professionals, Robert E. Podolsky and
Gregory R. Sulliger,
were haunted by the fact that humanity is failing to evolve socially
in spite of making rapid advances technologically. Seeing this
situation as potentially fatal for humankind, they set out to
discover what would have to happen for the trend to be reversed and
for humanity to thrive in a realistically imaginable future. In
1993, after analyzing and discussing this question for two years,
the two put down on paper a set of definitions and principles which,
if widely adopted by our societal institutions, might suffice to
ensure humanity’s long-term success as a species. They called this
document the
Bill of Ethics.
In 2001 it came to
Podolsky’s attention that Dr. Deming’s admonitions to Japanese
industry, as well as to industry generally, had a logical
relationship to the Bill of
Ethics.
By analyzing the two sets of principles together he soon proved that
Deming’s Admonitions comprise a subset of the logical consequences
of the Bill of Ethics
and wrote up this proof in an article called,
"Dr.
Deming's Admonitions"
This discovery is significant in two ways. First, it proves that
application of the principles contained in the
Bill of Ethics
to the workings of industry
produces a massive increase in that industry’s creativity and vastly
increases its success, thus confirming the validity of the
Bill of Ethics
as applied to industry.
Secondly,
Podolsky’s discovery opened the way for him to examine the Japanese’
ill-fated experiment with Demingized education through the “logical
lens” of the Bill of Ethics.
In doing so he quickly discovered how the Japanese had gone astray
in their attempt to apply Deming’s industrial admonitions to their
educational system. He then went on to derive from the
Bill of Ethics
a new set of Deming-esque admonitions that comprise the core of the
new student-centered educational paradigm that we call the Titanian
Academic Education Program. To follow his reasoning and read his
conclusions, refer to
"Ethical Education".
Conclusion
We in Titania stand ready to teach you the new educational paradigm
and, should you choose to adopt it, to consult with you concerning
the challenges that you will doubtlessly encounter as you begin to
deploy it in practice. We are confident that if you and your
colleagues learn and persevere, we may all one day live in a world
of peace, love, creativity, and freedom. Please use the CONTACT
button below to reach us with questions or feedback.
   |